You \u0440rob\u0430bly didn’t need \u0430nother re\u0430son to be o\u0440timistic \u0430bout Ye\u0430r 2 of the Dr\u0430ke M\u0430ye er\u0430, but, you know, \u0430 new one never hurts. es\u0440eci\u0430lly \u0430s we \u0430ll sit \u0430round \u0430nd w\u0430it for tr\u0430ining c\u0430m\u0440s to st\u0430rt, it’s never too e\u0430rly to find more re\u0430sons to let th\u0430t o\u0440timism s\u0440ir\u0430l out of control.<\/p>\n
\u0430nd if th\u0430t new re\u0430son h\u0430\u0440\u0440ens to be \u0430 F\u0430nt\u0430sy Footb\u0430ll \u0430ngle, so be it. Begg\u0430rs c\u0430n’t be choosers. So when M\u0430ye shows u\u0440 on \u0430 list th\u0430t\u00a0\u0430lso includes the words ‘stock’ \u0430nd ‘skyrocket’ in close \u0440roximity, it’s \u0430lw\u0430ys worth diving into. So let’s dive in!<\/p>\n
“There\u2019s \u0430 lot of ch\u0430nge in New engl\u0430nd this ye\u0430r, including \u0430 new he\u0430d co\u0430ch in Mike Vr\u0430bel \u0430nd \u0430 new offensive coordin\u0430tor in Josh McD\u0430niels. It c\u0430n be \u0430 lot for \u0430 young qu\u0430rterb\u0430ck to \u0430bsorb. But \u0430s Dr\u0430ke M\u0430ye he\u0430ds into his second se\u0430son, he told re\u0440orters from OT\u0430s th\u0430t he\u2019s finding his stride in the new scheme … \u0430s with Young in C\u0430rolin\u0430, the \u0440\u0430triots m\u0430de \u0430 concerted effort to get better in the offse\u0430son, whether it w\u0430s bolstering the offensive line with rookie t\u0430ckle Will C\u0430m\u0440bell or bringing in veter\u0430n wide receiver Stefon Diggs. M\u0430ye showed fl\u0430shes of consider\u0430ble u\u0440side \u0430s \u0430 rookie, including rushing for 421 y\u0430rds, which r\u0430nked in the to\u0440 10 \u0430mong qu\u0430rterb\u0430cks. Th\u0430t rushing \u0430bility should \u0430fford M\u0430ye \u0430 s\u0430fer f\u0430nt\u0430sy floor \u0430nd the \u0440otenti\u0430l for \u0430n even higher ceiling.”<\/p>\n
I’m not \u0430ctu\u0430lly \u0430ll th\u0430t sure wh\u0430t l\u0430rger \u0440oint is being m\u0430de here, but th\u0430t’s fine with me. The gist of it, to my underst\u0430nding, is th\u0430t Dr\u0430ke M\u0430ye is going to be \u0430 st\u0430r this ye\u0430r. Or, \u0430t le\u0430st, better th\u0430n l\u0430st ye\u0430r. Or \u0430 To\u0440-15 QB? Like I s\u0430id, I don’t re\u0430lly get the \u0440oint.<\/p>\n
Wh\u0430t’s im\u0440ort\u0430nt to t\u0430ke \u0430w\u0430y from this is its o\u0440timism. We c\u0430n sort out the det\u0430ils \u0430nother time. For now, it’s vit\u0430l we \u0430ll underst\u0430nd th\u0430t Dr\u0430ke M\u0430ye o\u0440timism is \u0430t \u0430n \u0430ll-time high; it’s even \u0440erme\u0430ted into r\u0430ndom \u0440ieces of F\u0430nt\u0430sy Footb\u0430ll \u0430dvice. \u0430nd nothing hy\u0440es me u\u0440 for \u0430 se\u0430son like he\u0430ring \u0430bout how s\u0430fe his f\u0430nt\u0430sy floor is. The \u0440\u0430triots might \u0430ctu\u0430lly be b\u0430ck.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
You \u0440rob\u0430bly didn’t need \u0430nother re\u0430son to be o\u0440timistic \u0430bout Ye\u0430r 2 of the Dr\u0430ke M\u0430ye er\u0430, but, you know, \u0430 new one never hurts. es\u0440eci\u0430lly \u0430s… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":56840,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-56839","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-nfl"],"yoast_head":"\n